San Francisco artists are increasing their exposure. Spring open studios are growing and may nearly be as well attended as the city-wide fall open studios. While visiting the open studios at 689 Bryant last night I was often asked about the redevelopment of Hunters Point Shipyard – where my studio is located. Other artists wanted to know where the artists of The Point stood on Propositions G and F.
I didn’t know the differences between the two, now I do. For one version, I’ve quoted below:
Beyond Chron
http://quartz.he.net/~beyondch/news/index.php?itemid=5466
Back in San Francisco, the Lennar Corporation – which has a checkered past of broken promises for affordable housing and potential asbestos exposure to Hunters Point residents – is promoting Proposition G to “save the San Francisco 49ers.” Of course, the football team is moving to Santa Clara regardless of Prop G’s outcome – and the measure is really about giving the Florida-based company a juicy contract to build more condos in the City’s last black neighborhood.
In response, Supervisor Chris Daly and activists from POWER gathered signatures to put the Bayview Affordable Housing Initiative on the ballot. If passed, the measure would require that 50% of the housing development in Bayview-Hunters Point be affordable for people making 30-80% of the Area Median Income. Their measure has now qualified, and will be on the June ballot as Proposition F.
Technically, Prop F and Prop G are not incompatible. If they both pass, Lennar would still get to redevelop the neighborhood – but it would have to build at least 50% of its housing units as affordable. According to Lennar, that’s unacceptable. “It’s a poison pill,” said spokesman Kofi Bonner. “No private developer is going to be able to create something on this scale of development, including parks and infrastructure, and be able to provide 50 percent affordable housing.” So Lennar will campaign against Prop F.
I support mixed-use development in Hunters Point Shipyard,” said Daly, “and it’s not inconsistent to support both Propositions F and G. But I just have issues with Prop G’s conceptual framework – and how trustworthy Lennar is. What they’re really doing is a land grab, and we’re calling their bluff. I told them they should support Prop F if their real plan is to deliver what Bayview-Hunters Point needs: jobs and affordable housing. But if their plan is to extract as much profit, Prop F may be a poison pill.”
As far as I am aware, we have no position as to which prop best represents our interests. As other artists in the city are looking to see where the artists at The Point stand on the choice of the two we have some responsibility to take a position and let if be known. After all, in June all will vote on these issues.
While promises are well intentioned, the outcome of the redevelopment will be widely influenced by a host of complex issues, largely economic. The redevelopment of Bayview – Hunters Point is intended to be profitable, so it may be that sacrifices will have to be made to make it more so. I’d like to influence what corners may NOT be cut.
We artists, as members of the Bayview community want to have the best chance for survival and to thrive. I believe that Proposition F is more likely to encourage that outcome. And while Lennar is also our partner in realizing a new center for the arts, we do not yet have the option of a proposition to support that intention. So I suggest as a group that we endorse Proposition F—and by that I’d like to open the discussion.
Coincidentally it is in June, when the first building – 103 is slated for demolition, that we cast our ballots.
I also like Proposition 99.
Cheers, April





